Rugby World Cup – Change of rules

Share this post:

Should we make new rules for the Rugby World Cup (RWC)? In light of the various criticisms that have surfaced regarding the “boring” matches at the RWC (for example, see NZ Herald: Has Rugby Become Boring?[link defunct]), I have heard that they are looking at changing some of the rules. The criticisms largely revolve around the lack of daring (little breakthroughs) and too much kicking (punts, up and unders, drop goals, penalty kicks…). A good article on the topic of the proposed Experimental Law Variations (ELV) that are being proposed down under is here from Rugby Rewind. [defunct link]

I have heard that the IRB are reviewing the ruck (merci Matthieu!). The rule change would be to disallow the opposing team to handle the ball once a ruck has been formed in order to get the ball out faster. The second proposition I have heard is that they are considering eliminating the ability to throw back into your 22m in order to kick directly into touch.

I have been pondering a couple of other suggestions that I thought I might start here for you rugby fans.

1/ You can only kick directly into touch from behind your goal line. Considering the hefty boot that players have today, maybe this won’t stop the kicking, but it will make the act much more perilous.

2/ To the extent you could only kick into touch from behind your goal line, another idea would be to make the 22 dropout a 0 dropout. In other words, if you touch back, the drop must be taken on your goal line. This will make you think twice whether or not you should run out or kick from deep within.

2/ Disallow forwards [e.g. front and second row] from joining the back line. This would be awfully difficult to arbitrate, but American Football finds ways to keep certain players from changing function. The idea here would be give more space to the back line and stop, what we saw frequently happening, a massive line of defenders through which it was often just impossible to break.

What do you think?

Meanwhile, I read with great surprise the New Zealand Herald’s 1000+ page thread on the “crisis of All Blacks rugby.” The “Why do you think the All Blacks lost?” site has become a national obsession it would seem.

And, in a final point of interest, have any you ever witnessed the kicking competition at the end of a drawn match? This is the mechanic that is brought into play if after regulation period, prolongation and sudden death periods, the match is still tied, there is a place kick competition. Scroll down to see the “Kicking Competition” rules. Throughout the RWC this year, we saw a few close games but not even one game was tied at the end of regulation… much less after a sudden death period. Would that we had THAT kind of excitement!

Rugby Rumpus cartoon courtesy of Rugby Rewind.

3 Comments, RSS

  1. Richard

    The change of Rules IS coming in globally and have already been introduced in a limited way in Australia, resulting in an additional 5-7mins of actual play time or 1.5kms extra run time.

    No passing back into the 22 to kick out on full

    Minimum of 2 players per team per line-out:

    Permitting hands in ruck and bringing down maul. Attacking team or team moving forward will obtain possession from re-start. Players to enter from gate as is still the case

    Clearly, the Rules do NOT go far enough.

    There is a growing global view that the drop-kick should be reduced to 2 points and that the larger problem is having consistency among all referees

    To avoid the problems that occurred during the World Cup- forward passes, infringements etc.

    You may be interested to know that Wayne Barnes, Ref in Cardiff, overruled the touch judge referee’s “ forward pass” recommendation re the crucial French Try although the touch judge was clearly in a superior position to view the pass. In addition, Paddy O’Brien, Chairman on the IRB referee panel, is on record as admitting that the MCCallister sending off was incorrect. This resulting in the AB’s being 14 men down resulting the “suspect” French “forward pass” try.

    Either the touch judges views are to be adhered to (as in the TMO) or keep them out of all in –play” decisions altogether.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pin It on Pinterest