Fuelband versus Fitbit #2 – Furious Fallacies

Share this post:

In a prior post, I did a comparison chart between the Nike Fuelband and Fitbit. I looked at the features and benefits of each. I also compared the measurements that each provides in common: calories and steps. The only catch was that, last time, I wore each device on different wrists, which presumably created an imbalance. This month, I rectified and carried both devices on the same (dominant) hand. [NB The Fitbit actually allows for you to identify which is your dominant hand, while the Fuelband only asks about which wrist you will use in order to make the display readable.] Below are the results for the month of April. Clearly, as was shown in March, the fitbit is more sensitive to the steps taken and the average number of calories is closer to what an adult of my activity should be consuming.

Fitbit Nike Fuelband comparison - the myndset digital marketing

Month to month contact

Comparing with the results from the previous month where the Fitbit was taken from the left to right hand to join the Fuelband, it would seem that, in 30 days*, the results are completely out of whack. Looking at the Fuelband, which was always on the right hand, I consumed 2.7K more calories yet took 20K less steps.  Meanwhile, for the Fitbit, I took 50K more steps and consumed 4.5K more calories. The only notable difference in the month of April versus March was that I competed in a squash tournament one weekend. The results of those two days surely spiked, but I can tell you from the sore legs, that the following three days were very low!

[*I calculated only 30 days in the month of March]

Nike Fuelband Fitbit comparison - the myndset digital marketing

In looking at the numbers above, I thought I would check out the ratios of steps to calories. One can observe contrasting trends. The number of steps taken to burn up a calorie decreased by 20% for Nike’s Fuelband while they increased by 12% for Fitbit. Most unsatisfying. What we can determine is that these devices probably have a long way to go to become more accurate. If I had to lay a wager, I think that Fitbit has a better accelerometer than Fuelband.

Future of Nike Fuelband at play

nike-fuelband the myndset brand strategy

Nike has announced that it is disinvesting in the Nike+ Fuelband hardware. With 28 million members in its Nike+ Community, one has to believe that Nike will want to maintain the link to that vibrant base. Many journalists posit that Nike will surely be hooking with Apple which is preparing to get into the portable fitness devices (the iWatch). My friend Damien gave me his reading which was that Nike (in cahoots with Apple) wants to become the agnostic standard for fitness measurement, using its FUEL measurement across any and all devices. In essence, Nike wants to get out of the hardware business and focus on the software and the community. Probably makes sense if I were Nike. The Nike Fuelband certainly is lacking in ergonomy and user friendliness. I would argue that their software (accuracy) needs to be improved considerably as well.

User experience improvement for Fitbit

fitbit - the myndset brand strategy

In one more improvement that the Fitbit software might provide: the ability to edit the sleep records. The number of times that I programmed the Fitbit at bedtime but forgot to stop when waking outnumbers the times I did it correctly. This obviously makes a mockery of the sleep data. If they are alert, hopefully, Fitbit will make the fix! [This month, to check another feature on the Fitbit, I am going to see if the fact that I incorrectly put the dominant hand can make any difference!]

Future of Wearable Fitness Devices

There are now dozens of competitive options for the wearable fitness device. These take the form of items that can be attached to various parts of the body and have various different metrics that they track, with varying degrees of accuracy. Absolutely, these devices help keep people motivated to stay fit. However, the standalone fitness bracelet may be a thing of the past as Nike’s exit likely presages. Having the fitness monitor integrated into a device that one wears ordinarily would be far more convenient. Issues of accuracy, functionality, battery life and ergonomy mean that there is plenty of room for progress and innovation. I personally am keen to watch how this plays out.

How do you think the wearable fitness device market will evolve?


2 Comments, RSS

  1. @mdial:disqus as always, an interesting and deep perspective. However, I feel the bigger question is not about feature and functionality of the wearable fitness devices, it is about the effectiveness of wearable technology to drive behavior change – in this case, maintained or increased activity and/or heightened awareness that encourages wellness. History shows that often the weaker products gain greater market share because of a connection they make with the user. This is likely true for any of the wearables and gain market share will be a function of intangibles, tangibles, branding and quality – and less about a product feature, functionality comparison. Your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to my bi-weekly newsletter

Subscribe to my bi-weekly newsletter

for exclusive content, insights and eye-opening videos. My promise is to stimulate, educate and entertain. I'll also give an overview of the latest content and alerts about upcoming events at which I will be speaking. You can always find my books on Amazon, including my latest book on leadership, You Lead, How Being Yourself Makes You A Better Leader by Kogan Page.

Thank you! You have successfully subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest